Urban Nature Reserves

Visited 2 urban nature reserves to get inspiration for our current projects. Went to Middlesex Filter Beds  and Camley Street Nature Reserve. They are both similar in size to the main part of the site at Tannery Basin that we work on along the Wey and Arun Canal. Both quite different - the filter beds have a strong industrial heritage and the management is not very obvious on site and Camley street feels very cosy and the management of the site is what makes the site successful.

In these comparing diagrams you get a good understanding of the land use of the 3 sites and especially the relationship between the water and the open space. The filter beds are especially relevant to look at in comparison to Tannery Basin - the both have a natural river and a canal adjacent. The filter beds are made up of semi natural habitats where the filter beds previously used to provide the surrounding areas with purified water. The beds were active for 100 years before they were shut in 1969. Since then nature and wildlife has colonised the space. It is part of a network of spaces in the Lee Valley. Walking down from Lee Bridge Road you can spot the north end of the site. Nature is contained in the former beds and along the edges of the space. You are very much a spectator in this space, taking in the nature, history and sounds from the reed beds. The space is managed to stay wild and management is not obvious, even a regular management and volunteer programme exists. 
Nature was very beautiful when I visited in early April. Even though it wasn't very green, the reeds created a very special feeling in the space. The image on the right show the difference to the space in the summer. The seasonal changes not only changes the site, but also the relationship with the surroundings. This is also the case at Tannery Basin. 
Camley Street is a community project which involves nature conservation (this is how reserve is described in the management report). The space has a range of habitats including secondary woodland, wetland, marsh and grassland.  It is run mainly by volunteers. There is also a strong events programme, which includes education sessions. The challenge at Camley Street is to encourage a greater diversity if volunteers and visitors. 

The space encourages learning and this is evident in the details across the site - with lots of habitat creations. All cut wood on site is re used on site. In edging, on paths or left to create habitats. It shows a range of easy measurements to habitat creation and doesn't undermine the beauty of the space. I really like the tree trunk edging and to see how different natural materials is used across the space.

In conclusion both these sites show the importance of management - but in different ways. There is a strong relationship with the adjacent water which is reflected in the habitats and use of space.  Seasonal changes alters the legibility and relationship with the surroundings.  One site encourages you take part and the other one to be a spectator - both very successful and well used spaces. 

Extended essay - oppurtunity

The subject of my extended essay is an important decision as this is an opportunity to learn and get deeper knowledge about a certain area that is close to my interests as a landscape architect. 

My initial thought was to look into food production / growing in an urban environment, not calling it Urban agriculture - but more interested in smaller scale solutions that can make a big difference.

My other thought is to look into the planting element that is used in urban environments today. In a lot of urban schemes a lot of block / mono cultural planting is used and I wanted to investigate what benefits a more naturalistic solution could have. Also looking at other ecological solutions that can be applied in different spaces to change the way a process works. 

I think it is important that the subject of the essay is a something that will increase my knowledge in area that will benefit me when I start to work in a practice. I think both these subjects are close to heart and is valuable knowledge that I can use in projects. 

Interesting diverse projects

In this post I am looking at some of the most interesting projects done by Landscape Architects over th last years.

The reason why I like these ones are that the are very current and are addressing concerns that are very important today.  I also  looked at the range of different projects that a Landscape Architect may be undertaking - everything from master plans to landscape character assessments, large landscape design projects to food growing projects. I think it is interesting and important to understand that there are a number of different areas you can work in as a landscape architect. 

By looking at different projects and identifying skills needed for the different projects I hope to find out areas where it would benefit me to get better knowledge in.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Landscape character maps for Wales 

Landuse Consultants

Landscape Institute Strategic Landscape Planning Award 2008

Landuse consultants has produced a new map of Wales - based on its changing landscape character. The map describes 48 different landscape areas, but what makes the map unique is that it doesn't just describe the geology, land form and biodiversity. It describes each areas distinctive sense of place. 

The work is on going and the next step is public consultation in spring. 

Not all landscape practices takes on this kind of work, but I think it add another dimension to the design work that a landscape architect does. It is important to understand the bigger picture when designing a space and I would like to have the opportunity to work on projects like these in the future. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.offshoots.org.uk/gallery.html

Offshots, Burnley - Permaculture project

Managed by Groundwork Penine Lancashire

Is a permaculture project in Burnley. It is a great example of sustainable food growing - but is also exemplar when it come to community engagement. It is located on a former site of the walled kitchen gardens of Townley Hall. It is managed

 by Groundwork Penine Lancashire - they work principally as an organiser and facilitator. They help to get funding and has provided a master plan which has given a structure to work to and to allow a plan for development. 

The Production gardens are the heart of the project. The produce is part of Burnley food link. There is also other ecological elements on site such as a cob building, community compost scheme, tree nursery, beekeeping initiative, reed beds and a sensory garden. 

Offshoots involves people from the whole community, either through the composting project, as visitors to the site, as volunteers, or through colleges and schools running training courses - Offshoots is for people of all ages, abilities and backgrounds. 

Offshoots was one of the first of schemes like these that are now becoming more usual and popular. I think it is great. It provides a sense of community and is a response to threat of climate change. Some people might not think it is beautiful and does schemes like these need landscape architects involved? I think landscape architects can play an important role in making sure that the space works as best as it can in turns of layout and the the way different spaces work together.  A lot of the methods of processes in the projects - such as reed beds, composting, green roofs. etc is something that we as landscape architects should be experts in and we can also help to bring new ecological and sustainable processes to a project. 

A well designed space should be well used, bring a sense of place and community and I think we can learn a lot from projects like these. 

http://www.offshoots.org.uk/gallery.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daniaoarken, Western Harbour in Malmo

Sweco

The park was created as part of a residential development in the harbour of Malmo Sweden. The park has no spatial boundaries part from the residential blocks at the back edge and is in a wind swept and open landscape. The elements of exposure and openness in the park make a strong contrast to the adjacent city district with its small, narrow alleys and squares. There are a few sheltered spots in the perennial terraces - but part from that you are really open to the elements here. 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/aodland/461105587/

The platforms out to the sea are playful and kids love jumping off them in the summer time. There are also tall climbing walls to get back up again. 

I like the simplicity and swedishness of this project. Being from Sweden I have always had a strong connection to the water - because of the many lakes and growing up spending my summers by the sea. I think the material use and openness is great. 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/elsamu/1117696475/

I choose to look at this project cause it uses clean modern  and playful design that work with the natural elements and responds and makes them stronger in the setting. I think that is another way of responding to nature and it brings attention to the sea and the possibilities of water. It brings out  and connects with water without intruding. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To sum up;

To find out more about what I need to do and what I need to learn to make myself emplyable when I finish univeristy I choose to look at some interesting and different projects in the landscape profession instead of looking at a particular practice. I think by looking at projects that I like and the principles of these projects I can identify what I like to learn more about and methods to try out in mys last projects this year. 

In the play project we are working on at the moment I am interested in trying to combine a sensory hearing garden with play and food production to bring together a community in a playful way.

In the canal restoration project we just finished working on I will add some more management princilpes and really describe the ecolgical processes I use in the scheme. I will also try to describe how this can be used to create a sense of place and character that fits in the existing landscape. 

Kew Gardens

Compost and Waste Management

I have been to Kew several times – but this time I was given the chance to see a bit of the behind the scene of the running and management. As part of our theoretical module on the course we met David Barnes, the Manager of Horticultural Support at Kew.

Kew Garden has a responsibility to protect and take care of its collections of plants and seeds. With this comes a responsibility to its surroundings and setting as well. Kew is located on flat, dry and free draining gravely and sandy soil. The soil gets very dry in the summer – with nutrients draining away. Kew is also located on the Heathrow fly path and the emissions and pollution also affects the garden and its species.

Irrigation is a must for Kew. The irrigation system has recently been updated.  The water comes from the mains and fills up a 70 000 litre storage tank – from there it leads to water ring circulating the whole site and from there feeding directly to the plants. This reduces the leaks and makes it easier to control which areas you water. 

Rainwater is collected from the main buildings and fills up tanks. The rainwater collecting system is not as developed as they would like – but is something they are looking on improving for the future.

The composting system is well developed at Kew. All the plant material from the maintenance on site is broken down to compost on site. It is all a natural and organic process with only stable manoeuvre added to the other ingredients of water and CO2.  The manoeuvre comes from the stables at St John’s Wood.

The compost yard has been there for 10 years and is built on concrete with a moat surrounding and collecting the runoff water from the compost heaps. This is to protect the Thames from runoff water which has very high levels of nutrients. The runoff water is instead collected and lead into a tank where it is filtered and then used to water the compost heaps. 

The materials are sorted on the yard by heaps of: herbaceous, manoeuvre and woody materials.  The woody materials are shredded and screened. Whilst the herbaceous materials only need shredding.  The wood chips are mixed 4:1 with the manoeuvre. Water is added and the heap is turned once to further speed up the process. It takes about 8 weeks before it is ready to go back out in the gardens to be used as surface mulch.

Close up look at the wood chips mixed with manoeuvre and to the right the wood chips are completely broken down into surface mulch.

The herbaceous materials are mixed on a 1:1 with manoeuvre. No water is added to this process as the herbaceous materials already have a high level of water.  The compost is ready after 6 weeks and is used as soil conditioner which is dug down to mix with the soil on a deeper level.

Herbaceous material starting to break down into compost.

The gardens are saving half million pounds every year by producing their own compost and it is obviously the most sustainable alternative as well.

An interesting fact about the compost heaps are the high levels of energy that they generate.  David Barnes mentioned that pipes could be lead underneath the heaps to help with possible water heating for an example. This is something I am surprised that Kew has not investigated further yet.

The talk also reached a point of discussion the waste generated by the public and if this is recycled. At the moment there is no recycling in place for this. David Barnes said that most of the waste from the public is high level of low weight plastics. Which is costly and complicated to recycle and there is issues with storing that amount of waste on site. But he said that he would like to put some systems in place.

I think the clue for this may lay in the management of the visitors. Waste is something that is hard to control – cause even if the food and products sold on site are being controlled  and more sustainable – you can’t keep people from bringing in their own food and waste to the site. 

The issue of carbon footprint was also discussed and I think that David Barnes answered the questions very well. He said how do measure the carbon footprint for a site for Kew. There is obviously the energy the site uses and the carbon that it emits. There is also certain inherited carbon in the buildings and also all the people visiting Kew.

The later can be put done to trying to manage your visitors and the way you can encourage them to think about the way the travel to the site for an example. Like the Eden Project gives discounts to everyone that arrives by cycle or foot.  This could be tried at Kew by maybe give discounts to everyone that produce a travel card or people showing that they live locally and can show that they walked to the site.

The visit was interesting and it was good to see the composting process which is surprisingly simple and organic. I think I site like Kew still has a long way to go in sustainable management processes – but by listening to David Barnes you realise that the interest is there and it comes downs to costs and procedures.